Analysis of seizure-cluster circadian periodicity from a long-term, open-label safety study of diazepam nasal spray.

OBJECTIVE: Seizure clusters require prompt medical treatment to minimize possible progression to status epilepticus, increased health care use, and disruptions to daily life. Isolated seizures may exhibit cyclical patterns, including circadian and longer rhythms. However, little is known about the cyclical patterns in seizure clusters. This post hoc analysis of data from a long-term, phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray modeled the periodicity of treated seizure clusters. METHODS: Mixed-effects cosinor analysis evaluated circadian rhythmicity, and single component cosinors using 12 and 24 h were used to calculate cosinor parameters (e.g., midline statistic of rhythm, wave ampitude, and acrophase [peak]). Analysis was completed for the full cohort and a consistent cohort of participants with two or more seizure clusters in each of four, 3-month periods. The influence of epilepsy type on cosinor parameters was also analyzed. RESULTS: Seizure-cluster events plotted across 24 h showed a bimodal distribution with acrophases (peaks) at ~06:30 and ~18:30. A 12-h plot showed a single peak at ~06:30. Cosinor analyses of the full and consistent cohort aligned, with acrophases for both models predicting peak seizure activity at ~23:30 on a 24-h scale and ~07:30 on a 12-h scale. The consistent cohort was associated with increases in baseline and peak seizure-cluster activity. Analysis by epilepsy type identified distinct trends. Seizure clusters in the focal epilepsy group peaked in the evening (acrophase 19:19), whereas events in the generalized epilepsy group peaked in the morning (acrophase 04:46). Together they compose the bimodal clustering observed over 24 h. SIGNIFICANCE: This analysis of seizure clusters treated with diazepam nasal spray demonstrated that seizure clusters occur cyclically in 12- and 24-h time frames similar to that reported with isolated seizures. Further elucidation of these patterns may provide important information for patient care, ranging from improved patient-centered outcomes to seizure-cluster prediction.

Safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray in male and female patients: Post hoc analysis of data from a phase 3 safety study.

Sex differences in drug pharmacokinetics include variations in the expression of the cytochrome P450 enzymes, which are involved in the metabolism of benzodiazepines. It is unclear whether sex influences outcomes associated with intranasally administered drugs. A post hoc analysis of sex differences was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of diazepam nasal spray, which included examining changes in the number of days between seizure clusters over time (SEIzure interVAL [SEIVAL]). Diazepam nasal spray is approved for acute treatment of seizure clusters in patients with epilepsy aged ≥6 years. Data from a phase 3 safety study were used to determine the proportion of second doses used within 24 h (ie, a proxy for effectiveness) and SEIVAL. Adverse events were recorded. Of 163 treated patients, 89 were female, and 74 were male. Approximately 16% of both sexes self-administered the study drug. A slightly higher proportion of seizure clusters was treated with a second dose in female (14.7%) than male (9.4%) patients. SEIVAL increased significantly and substantially over a year for all patients. The safety profile was generally similar between the sexes. These results suggest that potential sex differences in benzodiazepine pharmacokinetics do not meaningfully influence outcomes associated with diazepam nasal spray. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Some drugs may have differences in absorption and metabolism between genders that could translate into differences in safety and effectiveness. This safety study looked at diazepam nasal spray for treating seizure clusters in patients at least 6 years old. It found that safety was about the same for females and males. For both groups, most clusters stopped after only 1 dose of the drug, and the time between treated clusters got longer over a year.

Evolving Trends and Economic Burden of Benzodiazepine Use: Insights From a 10-Year Predictive Model.

OBJECTIVES: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are widely prescribed in Croatia to treat anxiety, insomnia, mood disorders, and epileptic seizures. Long-term BZD use is associated with memory loss, Alzheimer's disease, dependence, addiction, falls in elderly populations, and increased traffic accident risk. METHODS: Drug consumption data were obtained from the Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia website. Autoregressive integrated moving average models, constructed using R programming language, forecasted diazepam, alprazolam, and overall BZD utilization and financial costs at a national level over 10 years. RESULTS: BZD consumption increased by up to 18.6% between 2012 and 2020. During the same period, diazepam utilization rose by 29.1%, and alprazolam consumption increased by 19.4%. Our model predicts that, by 2032, BZD, diazepam, and alprazolam utilization will increase substantially. The total projected financial expenditure for BZDs in 2032 is estimated at 14.22 million euros, with diazepam and alprazolam expenditures at 7.39 and 4.12 million euros, respectively. These increases will result in significant growth in healthcare spending and a rise in adverse effects related to long-term use. CONCLUSIONS: National healthcare decision makers should consider implementing regulatory and legislative measures to quantify, specify, and limit monthly BZD use for each patient. This would help control the negative side effects of prolonged BZD use while continuing to provide treatment for patients who genuinely need it.

Efficacy and Safety of Anxiolytics in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient anxiety can complicate surgical outcomes by elevating blood pressure, increasing the need for postoperative pain management, and reducing overall patient satisfaction. Despite the use of anxiolytic medications in outpatient procedures, there is limited comparative evidence on the efficacy and safety of these agents in Mohs micrographic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of different preprocedural anxiolytic agents in Mohs surgery on perioperative patient anxiety and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted of 6 different preprocedural anxiolytic agents (lorazepam, diazepam, alprazolam, gabapentin, pregabalin, and melatonin) in 350 patients undergoing Mohs surgery. Anxiety and vital signs were recorded. RESULTS: Diazepam demonstrated a statistically significant, sustained reduction in anxiety levels compared with placebo ( p = .03). Gabapentin significantly reduced early anxiety ( p = .02). Alprazolam showed a trend to early anxiety reduction ( p = .08). Lorazepam ( p = .73), pregabalin ( p = .53), and melatonin ( p = .24) failed to reduce patient anxiety compared with placebo at any time point. No anxiolytic significantly impacted any patient vital sign or cognition. CONCLUSION: Although short-acting benzodiazepines and gamma-aminobutyric acid medications may have transient anxiolytic effects, a single oral dose of 5 mg of diazepam can provide a sustained anxiolytic effect in Mohs surgery, with excellent patient safety.

Baclofen during alcohol detoxification reduces the need for additional diazepam: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Baclofen may reduce the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal, as an alternative or as an adjuvant for benzodiazepines, but the available data are insufficient to support baclofen-assisted alcohol withdrawal. This study investigated the need for diazepam during acute alcohol withdrawal in patients receiving baclofen. In a single-blind, dose-dependent randomized controlled trial with three study arms, 63 patients with alcohol use disorder, starting in-patient benzodiazepine-assisted alcohol detoxification, were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 18), baclofen 30 mg/day (N = 20), or baclofen 60 mg/day (N = 25) for 7 days. Diazepam was provided as needed based on the withdrawal symptoms stated by Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-revised. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients in need of diazepam during alcohol detoxification. Secondary outcome measure included the between-group difference in the amount of diazepam needed during alcohol detoxification. Using baclofen 60 mg/day, 32% of patients needed additional diazepam compared to 35% on baclofen 30 mg/day and compared to 72% on placebo (P = .013). The median total amount of diazepam needed was significantly lower in patients receiving baclofen 60 mg/day (0 ± 10 mg diazepam) and baclofen 30 mg/day (0 ± 10 mg diazepam) compared to placebo (10 ± 43 mg diazepam; P = .017). Adverse events were comparable between patients on baclofen and placebo. Baclofen can reduce the withdrawal symptoms during alcohol detoxification. Baclofen was well tolerated and may be considered for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, especially useful in situations where benzodiazepines should be withheld, such as patients with liver impairment.

Safety of Diazepam Nasal Spray in Pediatric Patients With Developmental Epileptic Encephalopathies: Results From a Long-term Phase 3 Safety Study.

Pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathies are often refractory to treatment despite stable antiseizure therapy. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) as rescue therapy for seizure clusters was described in a long-term safety study. This post hoc analysis assessed safety and effectiveness within a subpopulation of patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies. Of 163 treated patients, 64 were diagnosed with ≥1 pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Among the most common developmental epileptic encephalopathies were Rett syndrome (n = 16), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 9), and Dravet syndrome (n = 7). In the broad pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathy group, 10.6% of seizure clusters were treated with a second dose, with similar proportions in the 3 individual encephalopathies. Across groups, treatment-emergent adverse event rates ranged from 66.7% to 100%. Only epistaxis (n = 2) was treatment-related and reported in >1 patient. In this long-term safety analysis in patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies, diazepam nasal spray demonstrated a consistent safety profile, supporting its use in these hard-to-treat patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02721069).

Concomitant cannabidiol does not impact safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray for seizure clusters: Post hoc analysis of a phase 3 safety study.

People with epilepsy may experience episodes of frequent seizure activity (seizure clusters, acute repetitive seizures), and benzodiazepines are the cornerstone of rescue treatment. Cannabidiol (CBD) can be used as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy, and it may interact with other antiseizure drugs, such as benzodiazepines. Here, we examined the safety and effectiveness of intermittent use of diazepam nasal spray in patients with seizure clusters who also received CBD treatment. This analysis included data from patients aged 6 to 65 years enrolled in a phase 3, long-term safety study of diazepam nasal spray. Age- and weight-based dosing of diazepam nasal spray were administered during a 12-month treatment period. Concomitant CBD use was recorded, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected. Of 163 treated patients, 119 (73.0%) did not receive CBD, 23 (14.1%) received the US Food and Drug Administration-approved highly purified CBD and 21 (12.9%) received another form of CBD. On average, patients receiving highly purified CBD were younger and more likely to have epileptic encephalopathies, including Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, than patients who received another CBD preparation or no CBD. Rates of TEAEs and serious TEAEs were greater in patients who received any form of CBD (90.9% and 45.5%, respectively) compared with no CBD (79.0% and 26.1%, respectively). However, the lowest rates of TEAEs attributed to diazepam nasal spray were reported in patients who received highly purified CBD (13.0%), and this result was maintained in those who received concomitant clobazam. Use of second doses of diazepam nasal spray, a proxy for effectiveness, was lowest in the highly purified-CBD group (8.2%) compared with the no-CBD (11.6%) and other-CBD groups (20.3%). These results suggest that CBD does not alter the safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray and supports concomitant use in appropriate patients.

Anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effect of Ibuprofen derivative through GABAergic neuromodulation in adult Zebrafish.

Anxiety and epilepsy affect millions of people worldwide, and the treatment of these pathologies involves the use of Benzodiazepines, drugs that have serious adverse effects such as dependence and sedation, so the discovery of new anxiolytic and antiepileptic drugs are necessary. Many routes for synthesizing ibuprofen derivatives have been developed, and these derivatives have shown promising pharmacological effects. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate its anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effect against the adult Zebrafish animal model of Ibuprofen (IBUACT) and its interaction with the GABAergic receptor through in silico studies. The light/dark preference test (Scototaxis test) was used to evaluate the anxiolytic behavior of adult Zebrafish acutely treated with IBUACT and Diazepam, and their anticonvulsant effects were investigated through the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizure model. Animals treated with IBUACT showed anxiolytic behavior similar to Diazepam, and pretreatment with flumazenil reversed this behavior. PTZ-induced seizures were delayed by IBUACT in all three stages and were shown to bind strongly in the Diazepam region of GABAA. In addition, this work presents evidence of new pharmacological applications of ibuprofen derivative in pathologies of the central nervous system (CNS), opening the horizon for new studies.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 impact efficacy and safety of diazepam in patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Diazepam is one of the most commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). However, diazepam sometimes is ineffective, and some patients experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions (ADR). Previous studies have shown that diazepam metabolism involves the CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 isoenzymes, whose activity is highly variable between individuals, which may contribute to differences in clinical response. PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the effects of the genetic polymorphisms CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 on the efficacy and safety of diazepam in patients with AWS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred male AWS patients received 30 mg/day diazepam by intramuscular injections for 5 days. Genotyping for CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367) and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization. The efficacy and safety assessments were performed using psychometric scales. RESULTS: Patients who carry CT and TT genotypes by polymorphic marker C > T intron 6 (rs35599367) of the CYP3A4 gene had a higher risk for ADR and demonstrated lower safety of diazepam therapy (p < 0.001; two-way ANOVA). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that genotyping for common CYP3A variants might have the potential to guide benzodiazepine withdrawal treatment.

A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial of Vigabatrin in the Management of Acute Alcohol Withdrawal.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a double blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of vigabatrin, a GABA-transaminase inhibitor, as a benzodiazepine sparing agent in the management of acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome in a residential setting. METHODS: We enrolled 120 patients with alcohol use disorder who were randomly assigned to either treatment with vigabatrin (2g/day for 4 days) or placebo. The primary outcome was defined as the number of participants in each treatment arm needing diazepam for withdrawal management. A secondary outcome prespecified was the total dose of diazepam received by participants in each treatment arm. Participants were recruited on admission to a residential withdrawal unit at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne from December 2014 to April 2019. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the number of participants requiring benzodiazepines during their residential withdrawal stay with 44 participants (78.6%) in placebo arm requiring at least one dose of diazepam compared to 38 (66.7%) in vigabatrin arm (p = .156). An 18.1% difference was observed between the proportion of participants who received a total dose of >100mg of diazepam during their residential withdrawal stay in placebo arm (32.1%), compared to vigabatrin arm (14.0%, p = .022). There were higher rates of reported adverse events in placebo arm with nine (15.0%) participants reporting adverse events compared with two (3.3%) participants in vigabatrin arm (p = .027). CONCLUSION: Vigabatrin significantly reduced the number of participants requiring >100mg diazepam over the course of their alcohol withdrawal and was associated with a reduction in adverse effects when compared to placebo.

Investigation of the Asyogh's rectangular device for learning and memory testing in Wistar rats.

This study aimed to design Asyogh's rectangular device that is used for memory testing in rodents. It was found that scopolamine (3 mg/kg i.p.) and diazepam (1 mg/kg i.p.) caused significant memory deficits in rats, as evidenced by increased transfer latency times. However, these memory deficits were significantly reversed when the rats were pretreated with Donepezil. It further demonstrates that pretreated donepezil is able to effectively restore the memory deficits induced by scopolamine and diazepam, as indicated by the significant recovery in TLT. The present study showed that the device used to measure transfer latency time that was a valuable tool for assessing memory and cognitive function in rodents.

Caffeine intoxication: Behavioral and electrocorticographic patterns in Wistar rats.

Caffeine is a psychoactive substance used worldwide. The present study analyzes the seizure-related behavior and electrocorticographic (ECoG) patterns observed in rats following of a toxic dose of caffeine (150 mg/kg; intraperitoneal). Sixty-three rats were divided into three experiments: 1-Behavior's Description associated with caffeine-induced convulsion; 2- Comparison of the electrocorticographic patterns induced by caffeine and pentylenetetrazole, and 3- Assessment of the electrocorticographic response to antiepileptic drugs (diazepam, phenytoin, and phenobarbital). The behavioral analysis demonstrated tonic-clonic seizures with a loss of postural reflex and a latency of 365.8 s after the caffeine's administration. Caffeine-induced changes in the ECoG were consistent with the development of seizures with rapid evolution and burst potential consistent with the behavioral patterns observed during the caffeine-induced seizure. The ECoG of the brainwaves varied significantly between the seizures caused by caffeine and pentylenetetrazole. The predominant brain forces observed during the seizures were beta-band oscillations. The caffeine-induced seizures were resistant to attempted control with phenytoin and phenobarbital, but responded well to diazepam, which is consistent with a study of Pilocarpine, which showed that diazepam has anticonvulsant effects. These findings are important for the development of effective treatments for caffeine intoxication, in particular for individuals with a low seizure threshold.

Association between CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 phenotypes and the pharmacokinetics and safety of diazepam.

Diazepam is a benzodiazepine (BZD) used worldwide for a variety of conditions. Long-term use of diazepam increases the risk for developing tolerance and dependence and for the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 mainly metabolize diazepam and are therefore the primary pharmacogenetic candidate biomarkers. In this work, we aimed to explore the impact of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 phenotypes and of 99 additional variants in other 31 pharmacogenes (including other CYP, UGT, NAT2 and CES enzymes, ABC and SLC transporters) on diazepam pharmacokinetic variability and safety. 30 healthy volunteers that had participated in a single-dose bioequivalence clinical trial of two diazepam formulations were enrolled in the present candidate gene pharmacogenetic study. CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (PMs) showed an almost 2-fold increase in AUC0-∞/DW compared to rapid (RMs) or normal (NM) metabolizers, and a 1.46-fold increase compared to intermediate metabolizers (IMs). CYP2B6 PMs showed a 2,74-fold higher AUC0-∞/DW compared to RMs, and 2.10-fold compared to NMs (p < 0.007). A dose reduction of 25-50 % may be appropriate for CYP2C19 or CYP2B6 PMs to avoid ADRs, dependence and tolerance. Combined CYP2C19 +CYP2B6 PMs may not use diazepam or sharper dose adjustments (e.g., a dose reduction of 50-70 %) may be advisable. To our knowledge, this is the first work to report a strong relationship between CYP2B6 phenotype and diazepam pharmacokinetics. Additional nominal associations (i.e., 0.007 

Preoperative oral diazepam for intraoperative blood pressure stabilisation in hypertensive patients undergoing vitrectomy under retrobulbar nerve block anaesthesia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: As a type of local anaesthesia, retrobulbar nerve block is often used in vitrectomy, with patients remaining conscious during the operation. The increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) caused by tension and fear during the operation-especially in patients with a history of hypertension-can negatively impact the safety of the procedure, resulting in suprachoroidal haemorrhage or retinal haemorrhage. Diazepam has a sedative effect and can relieve tension during surgery. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diazepam for intraoperative BP stabilisation in hypertensive patients under retrobulbar anaesthesia during surgery. METHODS: This single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled and parallel clinical trial will include 180 hypertensive patients who will undergo vitrectomy with nerve block anaesthesia. Study participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to intervention (patients receiving oral diazepam before the operation) and control (patients receiving oral placebo before the operation) groups. The primary outcome is the effective rate of intraoperative BP control (systolic BP during operation maintained at <160mmHg at all timepoints). The secondary outcomes are the proportion of patients with SBP ≥180 mmHg at any timepoint from operation to 1 h post-operation, the change of mean systolic blood pressure and mean heart rate during operation from baseline, as well as the number of patients with intraoperative and post-operative adverse reactions within 12 weeks of surgery. The logistic regression model will be performed to compare the outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of diazepam for intraoperative BP stabilisation in hypertensive patients under nerve block anaesthesia during surgery. The results of this trial will reveal whether diazepam has a significant effect on intraoperative BP stability in patients with a history of hypertension who require vitrectomy. If the results of this trial are significant, a large-scale multi-centre clinical trial can be designed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ChiCTR2100041772 . Registered on 5 January 2021.

Quality-of-life results in adults with epilepsy using diazepam nasal spray for seizure clusters from a long-term, open-label safety study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of seizure clusters and the use of intermittent rescue therapy for clusters on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with epilepsy has not been widely studied. The present analysis assessed QoL as a secondary endpoint among adult patients with seizure clusters enrolled in a long-term, phase 3, open-label safety study (NCT02721069) of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco®). The QoL aspect of patients in this study has not been previously published. METHODS: The 12-month safety study of diazepam nasal spray enrolled patients aged 6-65 years with seizure clusters. Adults aged ≥18 years completed the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE)-31-P at baseline (day 0) and days 30, 150, 270, and 365. This instrument includes questions about patient health and daily activities with numeric values (1-100) assigned to responses; higher scores indicate better QoL. The QOLIE-31-P includes 7 subscales: Seizure Worry, Overall QoL, Emotional Well-Being, Energy/Fatigue, Cognitive Functioning, Medication Effects, and Social Functioning; an Overall Score is calculated as a weighted composite of the 7 subscales. Comparisons were made between subgroups of patients who had frequent (≥2) and infrequent (<2) monthly dosing of diazepam nasal spray and those whose doses were administered by the patient or a care partner. This safety study was not powered to assess efficacy endpoints; descriptive statistics were calculated across time points. In addition, safety measures, including treatment-emergent adverse events, are reported. RESULTS: Seventy-two adults who responded to the QOLIE-31-P were included in the analyses. Mean QOLIE-31-P scores were stable or increased across time points. The mean total scores increased from day 0 to day 365 by 5.2 among patients providing data for ≥1 time point (follow-up group) and 2.2 among patients providing data at all time points (QOLIE all-assessments subgroup). Subscale means for Seizure Worry and Social Functioning showed the greatest numeric increase from baseline. Mean QOLIE-31-P scores were similar in all subgroups. The safety profile in the follow-up group was similar to that seen in all study adults. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with refractory epilepsy who were treated with diazepam nasal spray for seizure clusters maintained or improved QOLIE subscale scores across the 12-month study period. Seizure Worry and Social Functioning subscale scores increased over time, suggesting improvement in these domains for this population with intractable epilepsy. Changes among subscale results suggest differences in sensitivity to the use of an intermittent treatment. The potential to improve patient function with treatment for seizure clusters warrants further study.

[Acute benzodiazepine withdrawal delirium].

In this case report we describe a life-threatening episode of delirium in a 51-year-old man. The condition was triggered by an abrupt withdrawal of benzodiazepines. The patient had been taking multiple sedatives for several years but a large proportion of the drugs were not available in Denmark. His general practitioner substituted and prescribed oxazepam and zolpidem for ten days. Afterwards the patient did not have access to benzodiazepines and developed a severe benzodiazepine withdrawal delirium. He was treated with diazepam and olanzapine with gradual dose reduction.

A double-blind randomised crossover trial of low-dose flumazenil for benzodiazepine withdrawal: A proof of concept.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines (BZD) are a class of anxiolytics with varying uses, which primarily act on the GABAA receptor resulting in hyperpolarisation. BZDs are often a difficult drug class to cease once neuroadaptation has occurred; recommendations usually involve gradual dose reductions at variable rates. A growing body of evidence has suggested that low-dose flumazenil, a GABAA receptor antagonist, may be a useful agent to allow for rapid detoxification. AIM: To collect pilot data on the safety and efficacy of low-dose subcutaneous flumazenil to reduce BZD use, withdrawal symptoms, and craving in participants taking above and below the therapeutic maximum diazepam equivalent of 30 mg to inform on sample size for future trials. METHOD: In a randomised double-blinded crossover study design, participants received low-dose flumazenil first (4 mg/24 h for approximately eight days) or placebo first. Groups were divided into those taking < 30 mg diazepam equivalent and ≥ 30 mg diazepam equivalent at baseline. Main outcome measures were percentage reduction in daily diazepam use, withdrawal symptoms, and craving scores from baseline, difference in diazepam use across the placebo first group, and flumazenil related adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were recruited and randomised to flumazenil first (n = 14) and placebo first (n = 14). In participants taking ≥ 30 mg diazepam equivalent at baseline (n = 15), flumazenil significantly reduced diazepam use by 30.5% (p = 0.024) compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Low-dose flumazenil may aid in BZD detoxification in participants taking daily diazepam equivalent doses greater than or equal to the therapeutic maximum (≥30 mg) by reducing the need for diazepam.

Safety of Diazepam Nasal Spray in Children and Adolescents With Epilepsy: Results From a Long-Term Phase 3 Safety Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate safety and tolerability of long-term treatment with diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) for seizure clusters in patients aged six to 17 years. METHODS: The study enrolled patients aged six to 65 years with frequent seizure clusters. Age- and weight-based doses of diazepam nasal spray were administered; second doses were permitted if needed. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Of 163 treated patients, 45 (27.6%) were aged six to 11 years and 33 (20.2%) were aged 12 to 17 years. Mean doses per month were 2.1 in the 6 to 11 subgroup and 2.4 in the 12 to 17 subgroup. Of 1634 seizure clusters in pediatric patients, 186 (11.4%) required a second dose of diazepam nasal spray within 24 hours of the first dose. Similar proportions of TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported in 6 to 11 (91.1%, 40.0%) and 12 to 17 subgroups (81.8%, 30.3%), respectively. No serious TEAEs were considered treatment related, and no patients discontinued because of TEAEs. Treatment-related TEAEs were more frequent in the 12 to 17 subgroup; only epistaxis and somnolence occurred in two or more patients overall. TEAE rates were similar across subgroups that received concomitant clobazam (90.0%), received prior diazepam rectal gel (90.9%), and were administered less than two versus greater than or equal to two doses per month (87.2% for both) of diazepam nasal spray. Most survey respondents (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term safety analysis in pediatric patients with seizure clusters, repeated doses of diazepam nasal spray demonstrated a safety profile consistent across subgroups. These data support the dosing guidelines for diazepam nasal spray according to age and weight for pediatric patients.

Efficacy, safety, and economic impact of diazepam suppositories with as-needed acetaminophen for prevention of seizure recurrence during the same fever episode in children with suspected simple febrile seizures.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and economic impact of diazepam suppositories with as-needed acetaminophen in comparison with as-needed acetaminophen alone for prevention of seizure recurrence during the same fever episode in suspected pediatric simple febrile seizures (SFS). METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted from July 29, 2019 to February 15, 2021 at a children's hospital. Children aged 6 months to 60 months presenting to the emergency department with suspected SFS were included. Participants receiving both diazepam suppositories and as-needed acetaminophen were compared with those receiving as-needed acetaminophen alone. The primary outcome was seizure recurrence during the same fever episode. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, adverse events, and medical costs. RESULTS: Of the 316 participants, 228 (72.2%) had their first febrile seizure. Diazepam (.3-.5 mg/kg for up to two doses) was administered to 88 of 316 patients (27.8%). The outcomes were available for 306 patients. The recurrence rate was 3.5% (3/85) in the patients receiving diazepam with as-needed acetaminophen and 12.2% (27/221) in the patients receiving as-needed acetaminophen alone (relative risk = .29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .09-.93, p = .03). The adjusted odds ratio of diazepam administration against recurrence was .23 (95% CI = .07-.78, p = .02). None of the patients had a CNS pathology. No severe adverse events occurred, although mild ataxia was observed significantly more often in the patients receiving diazepam and as-needed acetaminophen (29.4% vs. 18.7%, p = .04). The median medical cost was US $199 (interquartile range [IQR] = 86-244) for the group receiving both medications and US $202 (IQR = 114-242) for the group receiving as-needed acetaminophen alone. SIGNIFICANCE: Compared with as-needed acetaminophen alone, diazepam with as-needed acetaminophen may reduce seizure recurrence more during the same fever episode without severe adverse events or additional costs in children with suspected SFS.